Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phil Tanny's avatar

You write, "The pattern of these incidents suggests a deliberate message: humanity is being warned about the dangers of nuclear weapons."

Your article is excellent, up to this point, where you begin to draw conclusions regarding the intent of The Visitors. The conclusions are reasonable enough, but they are speculation of course, given that we have no way (that I'm aware of) to know what the intentions of The Visitors actually are.

You write, "The continuing secrecy around these incidents serves no useful purpose"

Forgive me, but this too is unknown. As you can see for yourself here on Substack, interest in and knowledge about UFOs is on average very low. It seems at least reasonable to propose that the public at large is no where near ready for highest ranking authorities to confirm we don't actually have control over our nuclear weapons. It's one thing for you or me to make that claim, it's something else again for the President to say it.

I have growing sympathy for the enormous challenge facing the government.

If you were President would you go on nationwide TV to announce we don't have the final control over America's nuclear weapons?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts